From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jimenez v. Astrue

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Aug 4, 2008
286 F. App'x 16 (4th Cir. 2008)

Opinion

No. 08-1182.

Submitted: July 31, 2008.

Decided: August 4, 2008.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (1:06-cv-03228-JFM).

Rosemary L. Jimenez, Appellant Pro Se. Alex Samuel Gordon, Office of the United States Attorney, Allen F. Loucks, Assistant United States Attorney, Jennifer Wright Schick, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Before NIEMEYER and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

The opinion is filed by a quorum pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(d).

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Rosemary L. Jimenez appeals the district court's order granting defendants' motion for summary judgment in this employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jimenez v. Astrue, No. 1:06-cv-03228-JFM, 2007 WL 4287580 (D.Md., Nov. 20, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Jimenez v. Astrue

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Aug 4, 2008
286 F. App'x 16 (4th Cir. 2008)
Case details for

Jimenez v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:Rosemary L. JIMENEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael J. ASTRUE…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Aug 4, 2008

Citations

286 F. App'x 16 (4th Cir. 2008)