Opinion
CASE NO. 8:18-cv-683-T-23AAS
03-28-2018
ORDER
Jimenez filed a civil rights complaint and moves for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. The Prison Litigation Reform Act ("PLRA") amends 28 U.S.C. § 1915 by adding the following subsection:
(g) In no event shall a prisoner bring a civil action or appeal a judgment in a civil action or proceeding under this section if the prisoner has, on 3 or more prior occasions, while incarcerated or detained in any facility, brought an action or appeal in a court of the United States that was dismissed on the grounds that it is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, unless the prisoner is under imminent danger of serious physical injury."[F]ederal courts in this circuit mafy properly count as strikes lawsuits or appeals dismissed as frivolous, malicious or failing to state a claim upon which relief may be granted," including actions dismissed before the PLRA. Rivera v. Allin, 144 F.3d 719, 730 (11th Cir.), cert. dismissed, 524 U.S. 978 (1998), abrogated on other grounds by Jones v. Bock, 549 U.S. 199 (2007). Jimenez's actions that qualify as a "strike" under Section 1915(g) include Jimenez v. Bernie McCabe, 8:11-cv-1749-T-23AEP; Jimenez v. Bernie McCabe, 8:13-cv-439-T-23AEP; Jimenez v. Bob Dillinger, 8:13-cv-605-T-17AEP; and most recently, Jimenez v. Michael P. Jimenez, 8:13-cv-2346-T-23MAP, which was dismissed based on the "three-strikes" provision in Section 1915(g).
Because he has had three or more dismissals that qualify under Section 1915(g) and because he is not under imminent danger of serious physical injury, Jimenez is not entitled to proceed in forma pauperis. See Dupree v. Palmer, 284 F.3d 1234, 1236 (11th Cir. 2002) ("The purpose of the PLRA is to curtail abusive prisoner litigation."). This preclusion against proceeding in forma pauperis is without regard to the merits of the present civil rights complaint. Jimenez may initiate a new civil rights action by both filing a civil rights complaint and paying the $400.00 filing fee.
Accordingly, the complaint (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED without prejudice to the filing of a new complaint, in a new action, with a new case number, upon the payment of the $400.00 filing fee. The clerk must CLOSE this case.
ORDERED in Tampa, Florida, on March 28, 2018.
/s/_________
STEVEN D. MERRYDAY
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE