Ray Reed and his wife sued Jim Walter Homes, Inc., seeking damages arising out of the sale and construction of a house. The jury found that Jim Walter Homes, Inc. breached the warranty of good workmanship in the contract and that it was grossly negligent in the supervision of the construction of the house. Our concern is with the award of punitive or exemplary damages.

The jury found actual damages, additional damages as provided under the Deceptive Trade Practices Act, Tex.Bus. Com. Code § 17.46 (Vernon Supp. 1985), exemplary damages and attorney's fees. The trial court awarded actual damages and attorney's fees, disallowed the additional DTPA damages, and remitted a portion of the exemplary damages. The court of appeals modified the judgment of the trial court by awarding DTPA damages only and attorney's fees. In addition the court ordered a remittitur reducing the exemplary damages. 703 S.W.2d 701 at 708.

Although the principles of contract and tort causes of action are well settled, often it is difficult in practice to determine the type of action that is brought. We must look to the substance of the cause of action and not necessarily the manner in which it was pleaded. International Printing Pressmen and Ass't Union v. Smith, 145 Tex. 399, 198 S.W.2d 729 (1946).

The contractual relationship of the parties may create duties under both contract and tort law. Montgomery Ward Co. v. Scharrenbeck, 146 Tex. 153, 204 S.W.2d 508 (1947). The acts of a party may breach duties in tort or contract alone or simultaneously in both. The nature of the injury most often determines which duty or duties are breached. When the injury is only the economic loss to the subject of a contract itself, the action sounds in contract alone. Mid-Continent Aircraft Corp. v. Curry County Spraying Service, 572 S.W.2d 308, 312 (Tex. 1978); Nobility Homes of Texas, Inc. v. Shivers, 557 S.W.2d 77 (Tex. 1977). The Reeds' injury was that the house they were promised and paid for was not the house they received. This can only be characterized as a breach of contract, and breach of contract cannot support recovery of exemplary damages. Bellefonte Underwriters Insurance Co. v. Brown, 704 S.W.2d 742 (1986); Amoco Production Co. v. Alexander, 622 S.W.2d 563 (Tex. 1981).

The jury found Jim Walter Homes, Inc. to have been grossly negligent in its supervision of construction. Gross negligence is a mental state lower in culpability than intentional or willful acts. Luna v. North Star Dodge Sales, Inc., 667 S.W.2d 115 (Tex. 1984). Gross negligence in the breach of contract will not entitle an injured party to exemplary damages because even an intentional breach will not. Amoco Production Co. v. Alexander, 622 S.W.2d 563, 571 (Tex. 1981); City Products Corp. v. Berman, 610 S.W.2d 446, 450 (Tex. 1980).

To support an award of exemplary damages in this case, the plaintiff must prove a distinct tortious injury with actual damages. Bellefonte Underwriters Insurance Co. v. Brown, supra; Luna v. North Star Dodge Sales, Inc., supra; City Products Corp. v. Berman, supra. The only issue on actual damages inquired as to the cost of repairing the home to the condition it was represented to be in at the time of sale. Although the Reeds sought recovery for mental anguish in their petition, no issue was submitted on those damages. There were no other injuries found by the jury other than loss of the benefit of the bargain. Therefore, we reverse the court of appeals award of exemplary damages and affirm the remainder of the judgment.

Summaries of

Jim Walter Homes Inc. v. Reed

Supreme Court of Texas

Jul 16, 1986

711 S.W.2d 617 (Tex. 1986)

holding that a defendant could not be liable for exemplary damages for gross negligence in executing a home construction contract

Summary of this case from Monsalve v. CMG Fin.

holding that contract breach cannot support exemplary damages award even if conduct involves gross negligence

Summary of this case from Country Title, L.L.C. v. Jaiyeoba

holding economic loss rule applied where plaintiff attempted to cast breach of contract claim as tort claim

Summary of this case from James J. Flanagan Shipping Corp. v. Del Monte Fresh Produce N.A.

holding that because the homeowners' “injury was that the house they were promised and paid for was not the house they received,” they did not have a viable negligence cause of action—i.e., the construction of the home itself was the subject matter of the contract

Summary of this case from Flying J Inc. v. Meda, Inc.

holding action sounded in contract, not negligence, where only damages were loss to subject matter of contract itself

Summary of this case from Dallas Fire Insurance Co. v. Texas Contractors Surety & Casualty Agency

finding no independent tort arising from breach of good-workmanship warrant in construction of a house

Summary of this case from Blanchard v. Peoples Bank

concluding whether cause of action is based in contract or tort is based on substance of cause of action

Summary of this case from Dall. Area Rapid Transit & Nancy K. Johnson v. Amalgamated Transit Union Local No. 1338

In Jim Walter Homes, the court held that a homeowner could not recover punitive damages against a builder because the substance of the homeowner's claim was a breach of contract causing purely economic loss.

Summary of this case from Lamar Homes, Inc. v. Mid-Continent Cas. Co.

In Jim Walter Homes v. Reed the court rejected the Reeds' attempt to recover for defects in their home under a negligence theory.

Summary of this case from Arkwright-Boston Mfrs., v. Westinghouse Elec

In Jim Walter Homes, Inc. v. Reed, 711 S.W.2d 617 (Tex. 1986), a negligent supervision case, the Texas Supreme Court explained: “The nature of the injury most often determines which duty or duties are breached.

Summary of this case from Suissi v. Wells Fargo Bank

In Jim Walter Homes, the Texas Supreme Court noted that the "contractual relationship of the parties may create duties under both contract and tort law."

Summary of this case from R.P. Small Corp. v. Land Dep't

In Jim Walter Homes, Inc. v. Reed, 711 S.W.2d 617 (Tex. 1986), a negligent supervision case, the Texas Supreme Court explained: "The nature of the injury most often determines which duty or duties are breached.

Summary of this case from Mitchell v. Carrrington Mortg. Servs.

Summary of this case from Parsons v. Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust Co.

In Jim Walter Homes, the Texas Supreme Court reversed a jury verdict awarding exemplary damages for a homebuilder's grossly negligent supervision of the construction of a house.

Summary of this case from AXA Art Ams. Corp. v. Pub. Storage

Summary of this case from Yumilicious Franchise, L.L.C. v. Barrie

In Jim Walter Homes, Inc. v. Reed, 711 S.W.2d 617 (Tex. 1986), the Court held that a claim that plaintiffs' "house they were promised and paid for was not the house they received" could "only be characterized as a breach of contract."

Summary of this case from At&T Corp. v. Park I-10 Motors

Summary of this case from Smith v. JPMorgan Chase Bank

In Jim Walter Homes, Inc. v. Reed, 711 S.W.2d 617 (Tex. 1986), the Texas Supreme Court explained: "The nature of the injury most often determines which duty or duties are breached.

Summary of this case from Dixon v. Bank of N.Y. Mellon

Summary of this case from O'Leary v. JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A.

In Jim Walter Homes, Inc. v. Reed, 711 S.W.2d 617 (Tex.1986), a negligent supervision case, the Texas Supreme Court explained: “The nature of the injury most often determines which duty or duties are breached.

Summary of this case from Johnson v. Wells Fargo Bank

In Jim Walter Homes, Inc. v. Reed, 711 S.W.2d 617 (Tex.1986), a negligent supervision case, the Texas Supreme Court explained: “The nature of the injury most often determines which duty or duties are breached.

Summary of this case from Henderson v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

In Jim Walter Homes, Inc. v. Reed, 711 S.W.2d 617 (Tex. 1986), the Texas Supreme Court explained: "The nature of the injury most often determines which duty or duties are breached.

Summary of this case from Garcia v. Universal Mortg. Corp.

In Jim Walter Homes, Inc. v. Reed, 711 S.W.2d 617 (Tex.1986), a negligent supervision case, the Texas Supreme Court explained: “The nature of the injury most often determines which duty or duties are breached.

Summary of this case from Preston v. Seterus, Inc.

In Jim Walter Homes, Inc. v. Reed, 711 S.W.2d 617 (Tex. 1986), we recognized that, while the contractual relationship of the parties could create duties under both contract law and tort law, the "nature of the injury most often determines which duty or duties are breached.

Summary of this case from In re Soporex, Inc.

Summary of this case from Formosa Plast v. Presidio Engineers

Jim Walter Homes Inc. v. Reed

Summary

Opinion

Jim Walter Homes Inc. v. Reed

Jim Walter Homes Inc. v. Reed

Case Details

Citations

Citing Cases

Jim Walter Homes Inc. v. Reed

Summary

Opinion

Jim Walter Homes Inc. v. Reed

Jim Walter Homes Inc. v. Reed

Case Details

CitationsCopy Citation

Citing Cases

Citations