From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Muhaisen v. Doe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Mar 1, 2018
Civil Action No. 17-cv-01575-PAB-KLM (D. Colo. Mar. 1, 2018)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 17-cv-01575-PAB-KLM

03-01-2018

JIHAD MUHAISEN and MUHAISEN & MUHAISEN, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company, Plaintiffs, v. JOHN AND JANE DOES 1 THROUGH 100, all whose true names are unknown, Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S RECOMMENDATION

This matter is before the Court on the Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix filed on February 9, 2018 [Docket No. 31]. The Recommendation states that objections to the Recommendation must be filed within fourteen days after its service on the parties. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). The Recommendation was served on February 9, 2018. No party has objected to the Recommendation.

In the absence of an objection, the district court may review a magistrate judge's recommendation under any standard it deems appropriate. See Summers v. Utah, 927 F.2d 1165, 1167 (10th Cir. 1991); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985) ("[i]t does not appear that Congress intended to require district court review of a magistrate's factual or legal conclusions, under a de novo or any other standard, when neither party objects to those findings"). In this matter, the Court has reviewed the Recommendation to satisfy itself that there is "no clear error on the face of the record." Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), Advisory Committee Notes. Based on this review, the Court has concluded that the Recommendation is a correct application of the facts and the law. Accordingly, it is

This standard of review is something less than a "clearly erroneous or contrary to law" standard of review, Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a), which in turn is less than a de novo review. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). --------

ORDERED as follows:

1. The Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge [Docket No. 31] is accepted.

2. This case is administratively closed pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 41.2, subject to being reopened for good cause shown.

3. If no party files a stipulation to dismiss the case or a motion to reopen the case on or before September 1, 2018, this case will be dismissed with prejudice without further notice to the parties.

DATED March 1, 2018.

BY THE COURT:

s/Philip A. Brimmer

PHILIP A. BRIMMER

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Muhaisen v. Doe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Mar 1, 2018
Civil Action No. 17-cv-01575-PAB-KLM (D. Colo. Mar. 1, 2018)
Case details for

Muhaisen v. Doe

Case Details

Full title:JIHAD MUHAISEN and MUHAISEN & MUHAISEN, LLC, a Colorado limited liability…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Mar 1, 2018

Citations

Civil Action No. 17-cv-01575-PAB-KLM (D. Colo. Mar. 1, 2018)