Opinion
Submitted June 15, 1992
Decided September 22, 1992
Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the order of the Appellate Division which affirmed the order of Supreme Court denying defendants' motion for renewal, dismissed upon the ground that that order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied with $100 costs and necessary reproduction disbursements.
Judge HANCOCK, JR., taking no part.