From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

J.H.M. Realty Corp. v. Town of Belleville

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Dec 4, 1972
297 A.2d 2 (N.J. 1972)

Opinion

Argued November 20, 1972 —

Decided December 4, 1972.

Appeal from Superior Court, Appellate Division.

Mr. Samuel A. Gennet argued the cause for appellants ( Mr. John Methfessel, on the brief; Messrs. Gennet and Methfessel, attorneys). Mr. John I. Lisowski argued the cause for respondent ( Messrs. Morgan, Melhuish, Monaghan, McCoid and Spielvogel, attorneys).


Certification was granted in this matter, 60 N.J. 471 (1972), and also in Brooks v. City of Orange, 60 N.J. 514 (1972), also decided this day, 61 N.J. 576, to permit consideration of the doctrine of Reimann v. Monmouth Consolidated Water Co., 9 N.J. 134 (1952), and Sydney Grossman Hotel Corp. v. Lakewood Water Co., 27 N.J. 91 (1958). We are not persuaded to depart from those decisions and hence the judgment herein is affirmed.

For affirmance — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB, Justices HALL and MOUNTAIN, and Judges CONFORD, SULLIVAN and LEWIS — 6.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

J.H.M. Realty Corp. v. Town of Belleville

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Dec 4, 1972
297 A.2d 2 (N.J. 1972)
Case details for

J.H.M. Realty Corp. v. Town of Belleville

Case Details

Full title:J.H.M. REALTY CORP., A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, AND…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Dec 4, 1972

Citations

297 A.2d 2 (N.J. 1972)
297 A.2d 2

Citing Cases

Weinberg v. Dinger

" Id. at 92. In Brooks v. City of Orange, 61 N.J. 576 (1972), and J.H.M.Realty Corp. v. Town of Belleville,…

Weinberg v. Penns Grove Water Co.

In 1972 the Supreme Court unanimously and specifically reaffirmed the Reimann holding in two cases in the…