Opinion
No. 2D11–5793.
2013-03-27
In the Interest of J.H.G., a child. D.E.L., n/k/a D.E.A., Appellant, v. K.G., Appellee.
Affirmed. See Bridges v. Bridges, 734 So.2d 551, 552 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999) (holding that decision that mental health evaluator can testify under Florida Family Law Rule of Procedure 12.363(c) is within the broad discretion of the trial court); Wade v. Hirschman, 903 So.2d 928, 935 (Fla.2005) (finding competent, substantial evidence supported conclusion that there were substantial and material changes in circumstances justifying modification of child custody and finding no abuse of discretion in trial court's decision).