From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jhang v. Travis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jul 19, 2001
285 A.D.2d 874 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

Decided and Entered: July 19, 2001.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Lamont, J.), entered December 8, 2000 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioner's application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of the Board of Parole denying petitioner's request for parole release.

James Jhang, Altona, appellant in person.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney-General (Frank Brady of counsel), Albany, for respondent.

Before: Mercure, J.P., Crew III, Spain, Carpinello and Rose, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Petitioner has reappeared before the Board of Parole since the parole release determination giving rise to this proceeding and his request for parole release has again been denied. Given petitioner's subsequent appearance before the Board, the instant matter is now moot and must be dismissed (see, Matter of Atkins v. New York State Bd. of Parole, 273 A.D.2d 656). Furthermore, we are unpersuaded by petitioner's assertion that this matter presents an exception to the mootness doctrine (see, Matter of Diaz v. Travis, 273 A.D.2d 568, lv denied 95 N.Y.2d 764).

Mercure, J.P., Crew III, Spain, Carpinello and Rose, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.


Summaries of

Jhang v. Travis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jul 19, 2001
285 A.D.2d 874 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

Jhang v. Travis

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF JAMES JHANG, APPELLANT, v. BRION TRAVIS, AS CHAIR OF THE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jul 19, 2001

Citations

285 A.D.2d 874 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
727 N.Y.S.2d 361

Citing Cases

Jones v. Giambruno

New York law is well settled, "any challenge to a parole board hearing must be dismissed if petitioner is…

Hall v. New York State Division of Parole

During the pendency of the appeal, petitioner reappeared before the Board as scheduled in June 2004, at which…