From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jfurti, LLC v. Verschleiser

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK NEW YORK COUNTY PART IAS MOTION 3EFM
Jun 12, 2020
2020 N.Y. Slip Op. 31837 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2020)

Opinion

INDEX NO. 650803/2014

06-12-2020

JFURTI, LLC,SUMMER INVESTORS, LLC,WINTER 866 UN LLC,JACOB FRYDMAN Plaintiffs, v. ELI VERSCHLEISER, EVURTI, LLC,EVE, LLC,EVUNP HOLDINGS LLC, Defendants.


NYSCEF DOC. NO. 395 PRESENT: HON. JOEL M. COHEN Justice MOTION DATE 03/12/2020 MOTION SEQ. NO. 013

DECISION + ORDER ON MOTION

The following e-filed documents, listed by NYSCEF document number (Motion 013) 388, 389, 390, 393, 394 were read on this motion to/for ATTORNEY -.

In Motion Sequence Number 013, Plaintiffs' counsel, Daniel Edelman, Esq., seeks to withdraw as counsel. He asserts that withdrawal is warranted because "Plaintiffs have discharged [his] services as counsel" and "communications with Plaintiffs ha[ve] become strained" (NYSCEF 389 [Edelman aff]). Edelman asserts that "a stay is required so that [he] will not have to perform any further legal services and to prevent any prejudice to Plaintiffs" (id. ¶¶ 6-8).

Defendants' oppose this motion to the extent that a stay is requested and seek to have Edelman continue as Plaintiffs' counsel until a summary judgment motion, pending in the related EVUNP Holdings, LLC action (650841/2014) ("Related Action"), has been decided. Edelman's motion to withdraw in the Related Action addresses those issues which are not relevant in this action (see NYSCEF 384 [granting a stay of this action pending the resolution of trial in a related federal case]).

The motion to withdraw as counsel is granted subject to the conditions set out below. Generally, a client has an "unqualified right to terminate the attorney-client relationship at any time without any obligation other than to compensate the attorney for "the fair and reasonable value of the completed services" (e.g. Matter of Thelen LLP, 24 NY3d 16, 28 [2014]). Nothing in this record suggests that Edelman has not been paid for his services to date. Further, counsel is required to withdraw its representation upon termination by the client under Rule 1.16 (b) of the Rules of Professional Conduct.

Plaintiff's opposition to the request is irrelevant to this action given that the summary judgment motion discussed in its attorney's affirmation in opposition concerns an entirely different case (the Related Action) and, here, there is already a stay in place. Under the circumstances, no party will be prejudiced by Edelman's withdrawal and no stay of proceedings against Defendants is necessary.

In sum, the Court concludes that Edelman's withdrawal is warranted, and his motion is granted. Edelman is directed to advise Plaintiffs that the entity Plaintiffs must retain counsel to continue this litigation (see CPLR § 321 [a]). Additionally, any individual Plaintiffs must either retain new counsel or register their appearance(s) pro se. Edelman is also directed to comply with his obligations under Rule 1.16(e) of the Rules of Professional Conduct, as stated below.

* * * * *

Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that Edelman's motion to be relieved as counsel for Plaintiffs is granted, subject to the following conditions; it is further

ORDERED that Edelman shall comply with all obligations under Rule 1.16 (d) of the Rules of Professional Conduct, as applicable to the facts presented, to "take steps, to the extent reasonably practicable, to avoid foreseeable prejudice to the rights of the clients, including giving reasonable notice to the clients, . . . delivering to the clients all papers and property to which the clients are entitled, promptly refunding any part of a fee paid in advance that has not been earned and complying with applicable laws and rules."; it is further

ORDERED that, within 5 days from the Court's entry of this Order on NYSCEF, Edelman shall serve a copy of this Order with notice of entry upon Plaintiffs by email and, if practicable, by hard copy at their last known address by certified mail, return receipt requested, as well as upon the attorneys for all other parties and any pro se parties appearing herein by posting to the New York State Courts Electronic Filing System; it is further

ORDERED that, together with the copy of this Order with notice of entry served upon the Plaintiffs, moving counsel shall forward a notice directing the Plaintiffs to appoint a substitute attorney (entity Plaintiffs) within 21 days of such notice (see CPLR 321). If any individually named Plaintiff elects to proceed in this matter pro se, that individual must advise the Court of such a decision and register their appearance on NYSCEF within 30 days of moving counsel's notice; it is further

ORDERED that any new attorney retained by Plaintiffs shall file a notice of appearance within 21 days from the date the notice to retain new counsel is sent; it is further

ORDERED that outgoing counsel shall, within 5 days from the Court's entry of this Order on NYSCEF, serve a copy of this Order with notice of entry upon the Clerk of the General Clerk's Office (Room 119); it is further

ORDERED that such service upon the Clerk of the General Clerk's Office, the filing of a notice of appearance as provided herein, and the filing of papers as aforesaid shall be made in accordance with the procedures set forth in the Protocol on Courthouse and County Clerk Procedures for Electronically Filed Cases (accessible at the "E-Filing" page on the Court's website at the address www.nycourts.gov/supctmanh); and it is further

ORDERED that all parties are to advise the Court as to the status of the federal action by joint letter not later than July 28, 2020 at 11:00 a.m.

This Constitutes the Decision and Order of the Court. 6/12/2020

DATE

/s/ _________

JOEL M. COHEN, J.S.C.


Summaries of

Jfurti, LLC v. Verschleiser

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK NEW YORK COUNTY PART IAS MOTION 3EFM
Jun 12, 2020
2020 N.Y. Slip Op. 31837 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2020)
Case details for

Jfurti, LLC v. Verschleiser

Case Details

Full title:JFURTI, LLC,SUMMER INVESTORS, LLC,WINTER 866 UN LLC,JACOB FRYDMAN…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK NEW YORK COUNTY PART IAS MOTION 3EFM

Date published: Jun 12, 2020

Citations

2020 N.Y. Slip Op. 31837 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2020)