From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jewett v. United States Parole Commission

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Dec 19, 2003
84 F. App'x 894 (9th Cir. 2003)

Opinion

Submitted December 8, 2003.

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 36-3)

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California, Lourdes G. Baird, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-02-07315-LGB.

James Dwight Jewett, Federal Correctional Institution, Lompoc, CA, for Petitioner-Appellant.

Bruce Searby, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Los Angeles, CA, for Respondent-Appellee.


Before GOODWIN, WALLACE, and MCKEOWN, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Federal prisoner James Dwight Jewett appeals pro se the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas corpus petition, challenging the United States Parole Commission's calculation of credit for time

Page 895.

he spent in federal custody and its determination of the offense severity rating for violating the terms of his parole. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253. We review de novo a district court's denial of a § 2241 petition, see Benny v. United States Parole Commission, 295 F.3d 977, 981 (9th Cir.2002), and we affirm for the reasons set forth in the magistrate judge's report and recommendation, as adopted by the district court.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Jewett v. United States Parole Commission

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Dec 19, 2003
84 F. App'x 894 (9th Cir. 2003)
Case details for

Jewett v. United States Parole Commission

Case Details

Full title:James Dwight JEWETT, Petitioner--Appellant, v. UNITED STATES PAROLE…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Dec 19, 2003

Citations

84 F. App'x 894 (9th Cir. 2003)