From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jett v. Stephens

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION
Sep 23, 2015
CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:15cv252 (E.D. Tex. Sep. 23, 2015)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:15cv252

09-23-2015

RICHARD VILLAREAL JETT #1535515 v. WILLIAM STEPHENS, ET AL.


MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND ENTERING FINAL JUDGMENT

The Plaintiff Richard Jett, proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. §1983 complaining of alleged violations of his constitutional rights. This Court ordered that the case be referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1) and (3) and the Amended Order for the Adoption of Local Rules for the Assignment of Duties to United States Magistrate Judges.

After review of the pleadings, the magistrate judge issued a report recommending that Jett's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis be denied and that the lawsuit be dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915(g). Jett received a copy of the magistrate judge's report but filed no objections thereto; accordingly, he is barred from de novo review by the district judge of those findings, conclusions, and recommendations and, except upon grounds of plain error, from appellate review of the unobjected-to factual findings and legal conclusions accepted and adopted by the district court. Douglass v. United Services Automobile Association, 79 F.3d 1415, 1430 (5th Cir. 1996) (en banc).

The Court has carefully reviewed the pleadings and documents in this case, as well as the Report of the Magistrate Judge. Upon such review, the Court has concluded that the Report of the Magistrate Judge is correct. It is accordingly

ORDERED that the report of the magistrate judge (docket no. 6) is ADOPTED as the opinion of the District Court. It is further

ORDERED that the above-styled civil action is DISMISSED with prejudice as to the refiling of another in forma pauperis lawsuit raising the same claims as herein presented, but without prejudice to the refiling of this lawsuit without seeking in forma pauperis status and upon payment of the statutory filing fee. It is further

ORDERED that should the Plaintiff pay the full filing fee within 15 days after the date of entry of final judgment in this case, he shall be allowed to proceed in the lawsuit as through the full fee had been paid from the outset. Because Jett is ineligible to proceed in forma pauperis, the full filing fee is $400.00. Finally, it is

ORDERED that any and all motions which may be pending in this action are hereby DENIED.

SIGNED this 23rd day of September, 2015.

/s/_________

MICHAEL H. SCHNEIDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Jett v. Stephens

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION
Sep 23, 2015
CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:15cv252 (E.D. Tex. Sep. 23, 2015)
Case details for

Jett v. Stephens

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD VILLAREAL JETT #1535515 v. WILLIAM STEPHENS, ET AL.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Date published: Sep 23, 2015

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:15cv252 (E.D. Tex. Sep. 23, 2015)