From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jeter v. Reyes

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 6, 2023
1:23-cv-0110 JLT SKO (PC) (E.D. Cal. Sep. 6, 2023)

Opinion

1:23-cv-0110 JLT SKO (PC)

09-06-2023

ANTONIO JETER, Plaintiff, v. REYES, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, DISMISSING THE ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE, AND DIRECTING THE CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE THE CASE (DOC. 14)

Antonio Jeter seeks to hold the defendants liable for civil rights violations pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On July 17, 2023, the magistrate judge screened Plaintiff's complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a), and found Plaintiff did not state a cognizable claim upon which relief could be granted. (Doc. 12.) Plaintiff was granted 21 days to file an amended complaint. (Id. at 13.) The Court also informed Plaintiff that if he failed to do so, the magistrate judge would “recommend that this action be dismissed, without prejudice, for failure to obey a court order and for failure to prosecute.” (Id., emphasis omitted.)

After Plaintiff did not file an amended complaint or otherwise respond to the screening order, the magistrate judge found Plaintiff failed to prosecute his case and failed comply with the Court's order. (Doc. 14.) Therefore, the magistrate judge recommended the action be dismissed. (Id. at 4.) The Court served the Findings and Recommendations on Plaintiff and notified him that any objections were due within 14 days of the date of service. (Id.) The Court also advised him that the “[f]ailure to file objections within the specified time may result in waiver of his rights on appeal.” (Id., citing Wilkerson v. Wheeler, 772 F.3d 834, 839 (9th Cir. 2014); Baxter v. Sullivan, 923 F.2d 1391, 1394 (9th Cir. 1991).) No objections were filed.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court conducted a de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the matter, the Court concludes the Findings and Recommendations are supported by the record and proper analysis. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS:

1. The Findings and Recommendations issued on August 16, 2023 (Doc. 14) are ADOPTED in full.
2. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiff's failure to obey court orders and failure to prosecute.
3. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Jeter v. Reyes

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 6, 2023
1:23-cv-0110 JLT SKO (PC) (E.D. Cal. Sep. 6, 2023)
Case details for

Jeter v. Reyes

Case Details

Full title:ANTONIO JETER, Plaintiff, v. REYES, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Sep 6, 2023

Citations

1:23-cv-0110 JLT SKO (PC) (E.D. Cal. Sep. 6, 2023)