From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jeter v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Mar 27, 2013
Case. No. 12-10591 (E.D. Mich. Mar. 27, 2013)

Opinion

Case. No. 12-10591

03-27-2013

DONNA C. JETER, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant.


Hon. Lawrence P. Zatkoff


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Plaintiff filed this action challenging a final decision of Defendant Commissioner denying Plaintiff's application for Disability Insurance Benefits and Supplemental Security Income under the Social Security Act. This matter currently comes before the Court on the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [dkt 13], in which the Magistrate Judge recommends that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment [dkt 12] be denied and Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment [dkt 11] be granted, and that the case be remanded for further proceedings pursuant to the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Defendant has not filed objections to the Report and Recommendation. The Court has thoroughly reviewed the court file, the respective motions, and the Report and Recommendation. The Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED, and Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED in part.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with the Report and Recommendation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_______________

LAWRENCE P. ZATKOFF

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Jeter v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Mar 27, 2013
Case. No. 12-10591 (E.D. Mich. Mar. 27, 2013)
Case details for

Jeter v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

Case Details

Full title:DONNA C. JETER, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Mar 27, 2013

Citations

Case. No. 12-10591 (E.D. Mich. Mar. 27, 2013)