From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jess Arndell Constr. Co. v. Mogul 41 Lots, LLC

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Oct 29, 2013
No. 63029 (Nev. Oct. 29, 2013)

Opinion

No. 63029

10-29-2013

JESS ARNDELL CONSTRUCTION CO. INC., A NEVADA CORPORATION, Appellant, v. MOGUL 41 LOTS, LLC, A NEVADA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, Respondent.


An unpublished order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is an appeal from a district court order dismissing appellant's mechanic's lien counterclaims against respondent under NRCP 41(e). Second Judicial District Court, Washoe County; Brent T. Adams, Judge.

When our preliminary review of the docketing statement and the NRAP 3(g) documents revealed a potential jurisdictional defect, we ordered appellant to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Specifically, it appeared that the district court had not resolved (1) respondent's construction defect claims against appellant; and (2) appellant's third-party claims against Glen Highfield d/b/a Highfield Construction, such that no final, written, and appealable judgment adjudicating all of the rights and liabilities of all of the parties existed. NRAP 3A(b)(1); Lee v. GNLV Corp., 116 Nev. 424, 996 P.2d 416 (2000). See Valley Bank of Nev. v. Ginsburg, 110 Nev. 440, 874 P.2d 729 (1994) (noting that mere settlement, without an order formally dismissing the claims, does not finally end the action); KDI Sylvan Pools v. Workman, 107 Nev. 340, 342-43, 810 P.2d 1217, 1219 (1991) (recognizing that formal resolution generally is required for appellate jurisdictional purposes).

In a timely response, appellant submitted a copy of an NRCP 41(a) voluntary dismissal of its third-party claims against Glen Highfield. But as for respondent's construction defect claims against appellant, appellant argues that even though they have not been resolved, the order dismissing its counterclaims is final and appealable because it can be given preclusive effect. An order or judgment is final and appealable only when it resolves "the rights and liabilities of all parties and dispose[s] of all issues presented in the case." Lee, 116 Nev. at 427-28, 996 P.2d at 418. Here, as respondent's claims against appellant remain pending, no final and appealable order or judgment has been entered. We therefore lack jurisdiction, and we

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.

_________________, J.

Gibbons

_________________, J.

Parraguirre

_________________, J.

Douglas
cc: Hon. Brent T. Adams, District Judge

Margo Piscevich, Settlement Judge

Charles R. Kozak

Walsh, Baker & Rosevear, P.C.

Early Sullivan Wright Gizer & McRae, LLP

Washoe District Court Clerk


Summaries of

Jess Arndell Constr. Co. v. Mogul 41 Lots, LLC

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Oct 29, 2013
No. 63029 (Nev. Oct. 29, 2013)
Case details for

Jess Arndell Constr. Co. v. Mogul 41 Lots, LLC

Case Details

Full title:JESS ARNDELL CONSTRUCTION CO. INC., A NEVADA CORPORATION, Appellant, v…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: Oct 29, 2013

Citations

No. 63029 (Nev. Oct. 29, 2013)