From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jervi v. Britton

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jan 29, 2008
No. CIV S-07-2559 LKK KJM PS (E.D. Cal. Jan. 29, 2008)

Opinion

No. CIV S-07-2559 LKK KJM PS.

January 29, 2008


ORDER


Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed the above-entitled actions. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 72-302(c)(21).

On December 18, 2007, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed December 18, 2007, are adopted in full; and

2. The above-entitled action is summarily remanded to the Superior Court of California, County of Sacramento.


Summaries of

Jervi v. Britton

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jan 29, 2008
No. CIV S-07-2559 LKK KJM PS (E.D. Cal. Jan. 29, 2008)
Case details for

Jervi v. Britton

Case Details

Full title:K. E. JERVI, Plaintiff, v. CINDY BRITTON, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Jan 29, 2008

Citations

No. CIV S-07-2559 LKK KJM PS (E.D. Cal. Jan. 29, 2008)