From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jersawitz v. Bodiford

Supreme Court of Georgia
Jan 19, 1989
377 S.E.2d 502 (Ga. 1989)

Opinion

45992.

DECIDED JANUARY 19, 1989. RECONSIDERATION DENIED FEBRUARY 8, 1989.

Writ of prohibition. Cobb Superior Court. Before Judge Kreeger.

Jack Jersawitz, pro se. Haynie, Webb Litchfield, Robert F. Webb, Bruce D. Hornbuckle, Kris Skaar, for appellee.


Jack Jersawitz appeals from the denial of his application for writ of prohibition asking the superior court to compel a magistrate to issue an arrest warrant against the clerk of the Cobb County Superior Court for violating the Open Records Act. The trial court found no gross abuse of discretion by the magistrate, who had ruled that Jersawitz had other remedies available to him, and denied issuance of the writ.

"The writ of prohibition is the counterpart of mandamus, to restrain subordinate courts and inferior judicial tribunals from exceeding their jurisdiction, where no other legal remedy or relief is given. The granting or refusal thereof is governed by the same principles of right, necessity, and justice as apply to mandamus." OCGA § 9-6-40.

We affirm. Shantha v. Municipal Court of Atlanta, 240 Ga. 280, 281 ( 240 S.E.2d 32) (1977); Buie v. Buie, 175 Ga. 27 ( 165 S.E. 15) (1932).

Judgment affirmed. All the Justices concur.


DECIDED JANUARY 19, 1989 — RECONSIDERATION DENIED FEBRUARY 8, 1989.


Summaries of

Jersawitz v. Bodiford

Supreme Court of Georgia
Jan 19, 1989
377 S.E.2d 502 (Ga. 1989)
Case details for

Jersawitz v. Bodiford

Case Details

Full title:JERSAWITZ v. BODIFORD

Court:Supreme Court of Georgia

Date published: Jan 19, 1989

Citations

377 S.E.2d 502 (Ga. 1989)
258 Ga. 829

Citing Cases

Nally v. Howell

The petition was dismissed for failure to state a claim and Nalley appealed. 1. Mandamus will not issue to…

Chisholm v. Cofer

Mandamus is an extraordinary remedy which will not issue to compel a public officer to perform a…