From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jerry-El v. Wetzel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Apr 6, 2018
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:16-253 (W.D. Pa. Apr. 6, 2018)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:16-253

04-06-2018

BERNARD C. JERRY-EL, Plaintiff, v. JOHN E. WETZEL, et al., Defendants.


MEMORANDUM ORDER

This matter was referred to Magistrate Judge Keith A. Pesto for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636, and Local Civil Rule 72.

The Magistrate Judge filed a Report and Recommendation on March 19, 2018, ECF No. 72, recommending that Doctor Tretter's motion to dismiss, ECF No. 19, Doctor Salmeh and Doctor DeFelice's motion to dismiss, ECF No. 38, and the Pennsylvania Department of Corrections defendants' motion to dismiss, ECF No. 36, be granted without leave to amend the complaint.

The parties were notified that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), they had fourteen days to file written objections. Plaintiff filed timely objections, ECF No. 76, which I have reviewed de novo and accept and reject in part.

After de novo review of the record, the Report and Recommendation, and the timely objections thereto, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 6th day of April, 2018, it is

ORDERED that Doctor Tretter's motion to dismiss, ECF No. 19, Doctor Salmeh and Doctor DeFelice's motion to dismiss, ECF No. 38, and the Pennsylvania Department of Corrections defendants' motion to dismiss, ECF No. 36, are granted. The Report and Recommendation is adopted in part as the opinion of the Court insofar as it recommends dismissal without leave to amend the complaint against Doctor Tretter, Doctor Salameh, and Doctor DeFelice, and dismissal without leave to amend any claim under the Americans with Disabilities Act. However, the first two sentences of the paragraph beginning on the bottom of page 11 of the Report and Recommendation ("Allowing repeat amended complaints . . .") are not adopted by the Court. Furthermore, the Report and Recommendation is rejected as to its recommendation as to leave to amend the Eighth Amendment claims against the Pennsylvania Department of Corrections defendants. Leave to amend as to those defendants is granted because it does not appear that amendment would be futile. An amended complaint shall be filed on or before May 31, 2018.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ _________

KIM R. GIBSON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Notice to counsel of record by ECF and by U.S. Mail to:

Bernard Jerry AP-3307

S.C.I. Laurel Highlands

P.O. Box 631

5760 Glades Pike

Somerset, PA 15501-0631


Summaries of

Jerry-El v. Wetzel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Apr 6, 2018
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:16-253 (W.D. Pa. Apr. 6, 2018)
Case details for

Jerry-El v. Wetzel

Case Details

Full title:BERNARD C. JERRY-EL, Plaintiff, v. JOHN E. WETZEL, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Apr 6, 2018

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:16-253 (W.D. Pa. Apr. 6, 2018)