From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Beeman v. Caremark Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 10, 2018
ED 02-cv-01327 VAP (KKx) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 10, 2018)

Opinion

ED 02-cv-01327 VAP (KKx) ED 04-cv-00407 VAP (KKx)

01-10-2018

Jerry Beeman & Pharmacy Services, Inc., d/b/a Beeman's Pharmacy et al., et al. Plaintiffss, v. Caremark Inc. et al., et al. Defendants.


Judgment

TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:

Pursuant to the Order Granting Defendants' Motion for Terminating Sanctions Against Plaintiffs for Spoliation of Evidence (Doc. No. 415), IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiffs' complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Court orders that such judgment be entered.

IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 1/10/18

/s/_________

Virginia A. Phillips

Chief United States District Judge


Summaries of

Beeman v. Caremark Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 10, 2018
ED 02-cv-01327 VAP (KKx) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 10, 2018)
Case details for

Beeman v. Caremark Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Jerry Beeman & Pharmacy Services, Inc., d/b/a Beeman's Pharmacy et al., et…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 10, 2018

Citations

ED 02-cv-01327 VAP (KKx) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 10, 2018)