From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jerome v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Feb 2, 2005
891 So. 2d 1197 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

Opinion

No. 3D04-2998.

February 2, 2005.

An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Rosa Rodriguez, Judge.

David Jerome, in proper person.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, for appellee.

Before SHEPHERD, CORTINAS, and ROTHENBERG, JJ.


Appellant's motion to correct illegal sentence under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) was properly denied. As we recently reiterated in Matthews v. State, 891 So.2d 596 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004), Blakely v. Washington, ___ U.S. ___, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004) does not apply retroactively to motions for post-conviction relief. Defendants whose convictions became final prior to June 24, 2004 (the date Blakely was decided) may therefore not seek Rule 3.800 relief pursuant to Blakely. Appellant was convicted in June 1995 and his conviction become final on appeal in September 1996 — long before Blakely was decided. Blakely is inapplicable to this defendant.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Jerome v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Feb 2, 2005
891 So. 2d 1197 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)
Case details for

Jerome v. State

Case Details

Full title:David JEROME, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Feb 2, 2005

Citations

891 So. 2d 1197 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

Citing Cases

Lee v. State

Jontal Lee appeals an order denying his motions to correct illegal sentence under Florida Rule of Criminal…

Jerome v. State

See State v. Spencer, 751 So. 2d 47 (Fla. 1999) (holding that a party who abuses the judicial process by…