From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jerome Stevens Pharmaceuticals v. Budoff

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 22, 1985
112 A.D.2d 361 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Opinion

July 22, 1985

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Orgera, J.).


Order reversed, without costs or disbursements, and motion granted, on condition that within 20 days after service upon him of a copy of the order to be made hereon, with notice of entry, appellant personally pay the sum of $1,000 to the plaintiffs and serve a copy of his amended answer. In the event the condition is not complied with, then order affirmed, with costs.

Appellant seeks leave to amend his answer to include the affirmative defense of release. He alleges that plaintiffs executed the release on July 31, 1981. This action was commenced on August 13, 1982. If appellant's defense of release ultimately proves successful, plaintiffs will have unnecessarily expended time and expense preparing for trial, much of which could have been prevented by a more expeditious and timely amendment by appellant. This kind of prejudice is curable through the imposition of costs ( Campbell v. La Forgia Oil Co., 81 A.D.2d 824; Ciunci v. Wella Corp., 23 A.D.2d 754). Brown, J.P., Rubin, Lawrence and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Jerome Stevens Pharmaceuticals v. Budoff

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 22, 1985
112 A.D.2d 361 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)
Case details for

Jerome Stevens Pharmaceuticals v. Budoff

Case Details

Full title:JEROME STEVENS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., et al., Respondents, v. SEYMOUR…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 22, 1985

Citations

112 A.D.2d 361 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Citing Cases

Lazzari v. Qualcon Constr., LLC

That the amendment will be permitted does not end the inquiry, for CPLR 3025(a) demands that leave be granted…