Jerome-Duncan, Inc. v. Auto-By-Tel, L.L.C.

1 Citing case

  1. Kelly Services, Inc. v. Noretto

    495 F. Supp. 2d 645 (E.D. Mich. 2007)   Cited 38 times
    Finding pricing policies constituted a trade secret under MUTSA

    Additionally, this "extraordinary" remedy "should best be used sparingly." Jerome-Duncan, Inc. v. Auto-By-Tel, L.L.C., 966 F. Supp. 540, 541 (E.D. Mich. 1997) (Gadola, J.) (citations omitted). When considering whether to grant the "extraordinary" remedy of a preliminary injunction, a district court must consider and balance four factors: (1) whether the moving party has a strong likelihood of success on the merits; (2) whether the moving party would suffer irreparable injury without the preliminary injunction; (3) whether issuance of the preliminary injunction would cause substantial harm to others; and (4) whether the public interest would be served by issuance of the preliminary injunction.