From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jennings v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
Jul 28, 2015
NO. 03-15-00336-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 28, 2015)

Opinion

NO. 03-15-00336-CV

07-28-2015

Randy Jennings, Appellant v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Appellee


FROM THE TRAVIS COUNTY DISTRICT COURT, 126TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
NO. D-1-GN-15-000352, HONORABLE TIM SULAK, JUDGE PRESIDING
MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant filed a notice of appeal on June 1, 2015, stating that he is appealing an "Order to Proceed with Notice of Foreclosure Sale." Under Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 736.8, an order granting or denying an application for an expedited order allowing foreclosure of a lien is not subject to appeal. See Tex. R. Civ. P. 736.8(c). In his notice of appeal, Appellant stated that he "is aware that under Rule 736 no appeal may be made from any grant or denial of the Order [entered on April 13, 2015]." (Brackets in original.)

On July 9, 2015, the Clerk of this Court requested a response from appellant by July 20, 2015. The Clerk advised appellant that he must inform this Court of the basis on which jurisdiction exists or that this Court would dismiss this cause for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a). No response has been received. We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See id..

/s/_________

Melissa Goodwin, Justice
Before Justices Puryear, Goodwin, and Bourland Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction Filed: July 28, 2015


Summaries of

Jennings v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
Jul 28, 2015
NO. 03-15-00336-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 28, 2015)
Case details for

Jennings v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Case Details

Full title:Randy Jennings, Appellant v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Appellee

Court:TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

Date published: Jul 28, 2015

Citations

NO. 03-15-00336-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 28, 2015)

Citing Cases

Tehuti v. Bank of N.Y. Mellon Trust Co.

Because appellant attempts to appeal from an unappealable order, we dismiss the appeal for want of…