From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jennings v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jul 27, 2001
790 So. 2d 1191 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

Opinion

Case No. 2D01-1052

Opinion filed July 27, 2001.

Appeal pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Jack Espinosa, Jr., Judge.


Anthony Jennings appeals the summary denial of his motion to correct illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). Jennings alleges he is entitled to additional jail credit in case numbers 97-9236 and 99-13068. Specifically, he alleges he was awarded eighty days' jail credit for time served but is actually entitled to 224 days. The form motion Jennings filed failed to state a facially sufficient claim because it did not state that the claim could be determined without an evidentiary hearing and did not state "how his claim is established in the records available to the trial court." Rolon v. State, 26 Fla. L. Weekly D614, D614 (Fla. 2d DCA Feb. 28, 2001). Therefore, we affirm the trial court's order without prejudice to Jennings' right to file a facially sufficient claim under rule 3.800(a) or, if there is a factual dispute, a timely and sufficient motion under rule 3.850.

Affirmed.

STRINGER and DAVIS, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

Jennings v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jul 27, 2001
790 So. 2d 1191 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)
Case details for

Jennings v. State

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY JENNINGS, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Jul 27, 2001

Citations

790 So. 2d 1191 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)