From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jennings v. Joshua Idpndt. School Dist

U.S.
Jun 18, 1990
496 U.S. 935 (1990)

Summary

finding that, in passing on the validity of a state Medicaid plan, the court must determine whether the plan is procedurally and substantively in compliance

Summary of this case from Americare Properties, Inc., v. Whiteman

Opinion

No. 89-469.

June 18, 1990.


ORDER

C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 877 F. 2d 313.


Summaries of

Jennings v. Joshua Idpndt. School Dist

U.S.
Jun 18, 1990
496 U.S. 935 (1990)

finding that, in passing on the validity of a state Medicaid plan, the court must determine whether the plan is procedurally and substantively in compliance

Summary of this case from Americare Properties, Inc., v. Whiteman

Stating three criteria of findings process to be identification and determination of an efficient and economically operated hospital; costs that must be incurred by such a hospital; and, the payment rates which are reasonable and adequate to meet costs that must be incurred by an efficient and economically operated hospital

Summary of this case from Indiana State Bd. v. Tioga Pines
Case details for

Jennings v. Joshua Idpndt. School Dist

Case Details

Full title:JENNINGS, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NEXT FRIEND OF JENNINGS, A MINOR v. JOSHUA…

Court:U.S.

Date published: Jun 18, 1990

Citations

496 U.S. 935 (1990)

Citing Cases

Dept. of Health v. State Hosp

Responding to a similar argument, the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit held that state…

Kan. Health Care Ass'n v. Kan. Dep't of Soc. and Rehab. Servs.

See Wilder v. Virginia Hosp. Ass'n, 496 U.S. 498, 502, 110 S.Ct. 2510, 2513-14, 110 L.Ed.2d 455 (1990). The…