From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jennings v. Harris

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Aug 5, 2022
1:19CV1678 (N.D. Ohio Aug. 5, 2022)

Opinion

1:19CV1678

08-05-2022

Herman Jennings, Petitioner, v. Warden Chae Harris, Respondent.


MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER

JOHN R. ADAMS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

The Court has examined the Report and Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge submitted in this matter on July 6, 2022. Doc. 7 Upon due consideration, and no objections having been filed by the parties, the Court adopts the Report and recommended findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge and incorporates them herein. Therefore, it is ordered that the petition is hereby DENIED.

For the reasons set forth above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that the Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus is hereby DENIED and this matter is hereby DISMISSED. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C § 1915(a)(3), the Court certifies that Petitioner may not take an appeal from the Court's decision in good faith, and that there is no basis upon which to issue a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c); Fed. R. App. P. 22(b). .

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Jennings v. Harris

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Aug 5, 2022
1:19CV1678 (N.D. Ohio Aug. 5, 2022)
Case details for

Jennings v. Harris

Case Details

Full title:Herman Jennings, Petitioner, v. Warden Chae Harris, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division

Date published: Aug 5, 2022

Citations

1:19CV1678 (N.D. Ohio Aug. 5, 2022)