From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jennings v. Groose

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION
Apr 23, 2015
Case No. 4:94CV1349 CDP (E.D. Mo. Apr. 23, 2015)

Opinion

Case No. 4:94CV1349 CDP

04-23-2015

MARVIN JENNINGS, Petitioner, v. MICHAEL GROOSE, Respondent.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Petitioner asks me to reconsider my March 31, 2015, Memorandum and Order denying in part and dismissing in part his motion for relief from judgment under Rule 60 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. As petitioner makes no legal or factual arguments convincing me that my prior decision was in error, the motion to alter or amend judgment will be denied.

Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's motion to alter or amend the judgment [#31] is denied.

/s/_________

CATHERINE D. PERRY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated this 23rd day of April, 2015.


Summaries of

Jennings v. Groose

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION
Apr 23, 2015
Case No. 4:94CV1349 CDP (E.D. Mo. Apr. 23, 2015)
Case details for

Jennings v. Groose

Case Details

Full title:MARVIN JENNINGS, Petitioner, v. MICHAEL GROOSE, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Apr 23, 2015

Citations

Case No. 4:94CV1349 CDP (E.D. Mo. Apr. 23, 2015)