Opinion
CV 07-922-PK.
October 24, 2007
ORDER
Magistrate Judge Paul Papak issued Findings and Recommendation (#5) on September 20, 2007, in which he recommended this Court dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint (#1) for failure to state a claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). The matter is now before this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).
Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, this Court is relieved of its obligation to review the record de novo. Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). See also Lorin Corp. v. Goto Co., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (8th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, the Court does not find any error.
CONCLUSION
The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Papak's Findings and Recommendation (#5). Accordingly, the Court DISMISSES Plaintiff's Complaint (#1) for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.
IT IS SO ORDERED.