From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jennings v. Astrue

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Nov 21, 2011
No. 11 Civ. 0887 (RJS) (AJP) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 21, 2011)

Opinion

No. 11 Civ. 0887 (RJS) (AJP).

Filed November 21, 2011.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION


On February 9, 2011, Plaintiff Robert M. Jennings, who is represented by counsel, filed a complaint appealing the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security Administration (the "Commissioner" or "Defendant") to deny his application for Supplemental Security Income and Disability Insurance Benefits. The Court referred this matter to the Honorable Andrew J. Peck, Magistrate Judge, on February 17, 2011. On June 23, 2011, Plaintiff moved pursuant to Rule 12(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for judgment on the pleadings. On August 9, 2011, Defendant cross-moved for judgment on the pleadings. On October 3, 2011, Magistrate Judge Peck issued a Report and Recommendation (the "Report"), recommending that (1) Defendant's motion be denied, (2) Plaintiffs motion be granted, and (3) the case be remanded for further administrative proceedings consistent with the Report.

In the Report, Magistrate Peck advised the parties that failure to file timely objections to the Report would constitute a waiver of those objections. See 28 U.S.C. ¶ 636(b)(1)(C); Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). No party has filed objections to the Report, and the time to do so has expired. Cf. Frank v. Johnson, 968 F.2d 298 (2d Cir. 1993).

When no objections to a report and recommendation are made, the Court may adopt the report if there is no clear error on the face of the record. Adee Motor Cars, LLC v. Amato, 388 F. Supp. 2d 250, 253 (S.D.N.Y. 2005); La Torres v. Walker, 216 F. Supp. 2d 157, 159 (S.D.N.Y. 2000). Having reviewed Magistrate Judge Peck's thirty-four page Report, the Court finds that the reasoning and conclusions set forth therein are not facially erroneous. Accordingly, the Court adopts the Report in its entirety. For the foregoing reasons, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings is DENIED, Plaintiffs motion for judgment on the pleadings is GRANTED, and the case is remanded for further administrative proceedings. The clerk of the court is directed to terminate the motions located at Doc. Nos. 8 and 10 and to close this case.

SO ORDERED.

New York, New York.


Summaries of

Jennings v. Astrue

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Nov 21, 2011
No. 11 Civ. 0887 (RJS) (AJP) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 21, 2011)
Case details for

Jennings v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:JENNINGS v. ASTRUE

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Nov 21, 2011

Citations

No. 11 Civ. 0887 (RJS) (AJP) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 21, 2011)