holding that sufficient evidence existed to warrant the jury finding that certain third-party defendants were negligent and that their negligence was a direct and proximate cause of the plaintiffs injuries and noting that the jury found that another third-party defendant had breached an implied warranty, but that the breach was not a proximate cause of plaintiffs injuries
Summary of this case from Quintanilla v. City of Worcester, NoFebruary 26, 1980
Denied:
holding that sufficient evidence existed to warrant the jury finding that certain third-party defendants were negligent and that their negligence was a direct and proximate cause of the plaintiffs injuries and noting that the jury found that another third-party defendant had breached an implied warranty, but that the breach was not a proximate cause of plaintiffs injuries
Summary of this case from Quintanilla v. City of Worcester, NoFull title:ROGER JENNETT vs. COLORADO FUEL IRON CORP. another; WALTER BOYKO others…
Court:Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts
Date published: Feb 26, 1980
Philip J. Callan, Jr., for the defendant. The plaintiff Stone Webster Engineering Corp. (Stone Webster)…
Quintanilla v. City of Worcester, NoIn order for the City to hold Zarc liable, the City bears the burden at trial of proving that CAP-STUN caused…