Opinion
Civil Action 14-6354 21-1098 21-5000
05-01-2022
JENN-CHING LUO, Plaintiff, v. OWEN J. ROBERTS SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al., Defendants. JENN-CHING LUO, Plaintiff, v. OWEN J. ROBERTS SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al., Defendants. JENN-CHING LUO, Plaintiff, v. OWEN J. ROBERTS SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al., Defendants.
ORDER
Hon. Petrese B. Tucker, U.S.D.J.
AND NOW, this 18th day of March 2022, upon consideration of Defendants' Motions to Dismiss and Plaintiff's responses under Civil Action No. 14-6354 ; under Civil Action No. 211098 ; and under Civil Action No. 21-5000 ; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND DECREED that:
Defendant James Gerl's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 87), Defendants Sharon W. Montanye and Sweet Stevens Katz & Williams LLP's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 88), Defendant Keri Kolbay's Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint (ECF No. 91), Defendants Geoffrey Ball and Owen J. Roberts School District's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 95), Plaintiff Jenn-Ching Luo's Responses in Opposition to the Motions to Dismiss (ECF Nos. 89, 92, 93, 94, 96), and Defendants Sharon W. Montanye and Sweet Stevens Katz & Williams LLP's Reply to Plaintiff's Response (ECF No. 90).
Defendants Sharon W. Montanye and Sweet Stevens Katz & Williams LLP's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 5)), Defendant Owen J. Roberts School District's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 11), ), Defendant Pennsylvania Department of Education's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 17), and Plaintiff Jenn-Ching Luo's Responses in Opposition to the Motions to Dismiss (ECF Nos. 18, 19, 20).
Defendant Pennsylvania Department of Education's Motion to Dismiss and Reply Brief (ECF Nos. 7, 15), Defendants Dan O'Brien and Owen J. Roberts School District's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 11), Defendant Michael J. McElligott's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 14), and Plaintiff's Responses in Opposition (ECF Nos. 12, 13, 16, 18).
1. Defendants' Motions to Dismiss (Civil Action No. 14-6354 (ECF Nos. 87, 88, 91, 95)), (Civil Action No. 21-1098 (ECF Nos. 5, 11, 17)), (Civil Action No. 21-5000 (ECF Nos. 7, 11, 14)) are GRANTED, and all of Plaintiff's claims under all three dockets are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; 2. Plaintiff's Responses in Opposition to Defendants' Motions to Dismiss, filed as “Motions to Strike” (Civil Action No. 14-6354 (ECF Nos. 89, 93, 96)), and (Civil Action No. 21-5000 (ECF No. 18)) are DENIED and his claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; and 2 3. Plaintiff's First Motion for Relief to Enter Default Judgment (Civil Action No. 14-6354 (ECF No. 97)) is DENIED and his claims contained therein are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 3