From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jenkins v. United States

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Sep 30, 2019
No. 19-1772 (4th Cir. Sep. 30, 2019)

Opinion

No. 19-1772

09-30-2019

CLARENCE B. JENKINS, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant - Appellee.

Clarence B. Jenkins, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Terry L. Wooten, Senior District Judge. (3:17-cv-01775-TLW) Before NIEMEYER and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Clarence B. Jenkins, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Clarence B. Jenkins, Jr., appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying the United States' motion to dismiss Jenkins' complaint pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346(b)(1), 2671-2680 (2012). Jenkins also appeals the court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge, granting the United States' motion for summary judgment, and denying Jenkins' motion for summary judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jenkins v. United States, No. 3:17-cv-01775-TLW (D.S.C. Apr. 9, 2018; filed Jan. 31, 2019 & entered Feb. 1, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Jenkins v. United States

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Sep 30, 2019
No. 19-1772 (4th Cir. Sep. 30, 2019)
Case details for

Jenkins v. United States

Case Details

Full title:CLARENCE B. JENKINS, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Sep 30, 2019

Citations

No. 19-1772 (4th Cir. Sep. 30, 2019)