From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jenkins v. Steadman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 11, 1992
180 A.D.2d 491 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

February 11, 1992

Appeal from the Family Court, Bronx County (Rita G. Bolstad, J.).


There is no merit to respondent's contention that the court should have inquired as to whether he had received and understood the child support standards chart at the support proceeding where he appeared pro se. Family Court Act § 413 (1) (i), inter alia, prohibits a court from entering a final support order unless an unrepresented party receives a copy of the child support standards chart. The court thoroughly instructed respondent regarding his potential liability at the commencement of the proceedings, and respondent did not assert that he had not received a copy of the standards chart. Nor was there a violation of Family Court Act § 433 requiring that a respondent at a support proceeding be advised of his right to counsel. The record shows that respondent twice waived this right when questioned by the court officer and the Hearing Examiner.

Concur — Milonas, J.P., Wallach, Ross, Asch and Smith, JJ.


Summaries of

Jenkins v. Steadman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 11, 1992
180 A.D.2d 491 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

Jenkins v. Steadman

Case Details

Full title:CYNTHIA JENKINS, Respondent, v. CAL STEADMAN, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 11, 1992

Citations

180 A.D.2d 491 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
579 N.Y.S.2d 396

Citing Cases

Matter of Dillon v. Dillon

In the instant case, the appellant James Dillon failed to establish any basis for setting aside the…

Dunlop v. Bowen

"[t]he parties have been advised of the provisions of [ Family Ct Act § 413(1) ] and the unrepresented…