From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jenkins v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Oct 5, 1989
549 So. 2d 789 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

Opinion

No. 88-1580.

October 5, 1989.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Orange County, Jeffords D. Miller, J.

James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Daniel J. Schafer, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Kellie A. Nielan, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.


We affirm the defendant's convictions except as to the conviction of kidnapping with a weapon (§ 787.01, Fla. Stat.), which conviction is reversed because the confinement and movement involved in facts and circumstances occurring during the commission of the acts for which the defendant was convicted of six counts of sexual battery were, in our opinion, merely incidental to the sexual batteries, and therefore, do not meet the criteria for a kidnapping conviction as set forth in Faison v. State, 426 So.2d 963 (Fla. 1983).

We have determined that the elimination of the points on the guidelines scoresheet for the kidnapping charge does not affect the recommended guidelines sentence in this case and therefore we do not vacate the sentence nor remand for resentencing.

AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART.

DAUKSCH and GOSHORN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Jenkins v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Oct 5, 1989
549 So. 2d 789 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)
Case details for

Jenkins v. State

Case Details

Full title:STEPHEN NEIL JENKINS, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Oct 5, 1989

Citations

549 So. 2d 789 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

Citing Cases

Brown v. State

We have examined the facts against the criteria in Faison v. State, 426 So.2d 963 (Fla. 1983) and have…