From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jenkins v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Apr 4, 1997
691 So. 2d 41 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

Opinion

Case No. 96-3188

Opinion filed April 4, 1997.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County, Henry E. Davis, Judge.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and P. Douglas Brinkmeyer, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Daniel A. David, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for appellee.


Appellant seeks review of the order finding him in violation of his probation. We strike the finding that appellant violated condition four of his probation as it was not supported by any evidence other than the hearsay testimony of the probation officer. See Vezina v. State, 644 So.2d 602 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994);Scott v. State, 446 So.2d 1105 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984). We also note that the certified copy of appellant's driving record does not appear in the record. In addition, the written findings do not conform to the oral pronouncement of the court because the revocation order does not specify which terms of probation appellant violated. Because we cannot determine from the record whether the trial court would have revoked probation based solely on the remaining valid violations, we REVERSE and REMAND for reconsideration. Daniels v. State, 680 So.2d 490 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996); Gavins v. State, 587 So.2d 487 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991).

MINER, ALLEN and PADOVANO, JJ., CONCUR.


Summaries of

Jenkins v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Apr 4, 1997
691 So. 2d 41 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)
Case details for

Jenkins v. State

Case Details

Full title:MONTEMUS JENKINS, II, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Apr 4, 1997

Citations

691 So. 2d 41 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

Citing Cases

Taylor v. State

The judge did not indicate whether he would have revoked the appellant's probation and imposed the same…

Dixon v. State

Accordingly, we reverse the revocation order and remand the case to the trial court for further…