From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jenkins v. Maryland

U.S.
Apr 4, 1966
383 U.S. 834 (1966)

Opinion

ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND.

No. 605, Misc.

Decided April 4, 1966.

Certiorari granted; 238 Md. 451, 209 A.2d 616, vacated and remanded.

Petitioner pro se.

Thomas B. Finan, Attorney General of Maryland, for respondent.


Upon consideration of the entire record and the consent of the Attorney General of Maryland, the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The motion to remand is also granted, the judgment of the Court of Appeals of Maryland is vacated and the case is remanded to that court for further consideration in light of its decisions in Schowgurow v. Maryland, 240 Md. 121, 213 A.2d 475, and Smith v. Maryland, 240 Md. 464, 214 A.2d 563. This disposition of the case is without prejudice to any other questions presented by the petition for a writ of certiorari.


Summaries of

Jenkins v. Maryland

U.S.
Apr 4, 1966
383 U.S. 834 (1966)
Case details for

Jenkins v. Maryland

Case Details

Full title:JENKINS v . MARYLAND

Court:U.S.

Date published: Apr 4, 1966

Citations

383 U.S. 834 (1966)

Citing Cases

Street v. State

See O'Connor v. State, 234 Md. 459, 461, 199 A.2d 807, 808 (1964) (insufficient evidence to warrant an…

People v. Veda

In People v. Gibbons ( supra), it was held that the People had to prove by a preponderance of the evidence…