From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jenkins v. Martel

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Oct 7, 2014
CV 14-6349-VAP (RNB) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 7, 2014)

Opinion

         Decided October 3, 2014.

          Edward Jenkins, Petitioner, Pro se, Blythe, CA.


          ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

          VIRGINIA A. PHILLIPS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the records on file herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. No objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed herein. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

         IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that (1) this case is summarily dismissed pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts; and (2) Judgment be entered accordingly.


Summaries of

Jenkins v. Martel

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Oct 7, 2014
CV 14-6349-VAP (RNB) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 7, 2014)
Case details for

Jenkins v. Martel

Case Details

Full title:EDWARD JENKINS, Petitioner, v. MICHAEL F. MARTEL, Warden, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Oct 7, 2014

Citations

CV 14-6349-VAP (RNB) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 7, 2014)