From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jenkins v. Dretke

United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Beaumont Division
Nov 29, 2005
Civil Action No. 1:05CV622 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 29, 2005)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 1:05CV622.

November 29, 2005


MEMORANDUM ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION


Plaintiff Edward Jenkins, a prisoner confined at the Stiles Unit of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, proceeding pro se, filed this civil action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Douglas Dretke, the Director of TDCJ-CID. Plaintiff requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis.

This case was filed on a form intended for prisoners filing habeas petitions. Because the plaintiff complained about the conditions of his confinement rather than the fact or duration of his confinement, the case was construed as a civil rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. See Spina v. Aaron, 821 F.2d 1126, 1128 (5th Cir. 1987) (holding that the core issue in determining whether a prisoner must pursue habeas corpus relief rather than a civil rights action is to determine whether the prisoner challenges the fact or duration of his confinement or merely the rules, customs, and procedures affecting conditions of confinement).

The court ordered that this matter be referred to the Honorable Keith F. Giblin, United States Magistrate Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this court. The magistrate judge recommends dismissing the action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) as frivolous and for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.

The court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge filed pursuant to such order, along with the record, pleadings and all available evidence. No objections to the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge were filed by the parties.

ORDER

Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the magistrate judge are correct and the report of the magistrate judge is ADOPTED. A final judgment will be entered in this case in accordance with the magistrate judge's recommendation.

So ORDERED


Summaries of

Jenkins v. Dretke

United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Beaumont Division
Nov 29, 2005
Civil Action No. 1:05CV622 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 29, 2005)
Case details for

Jenkins v. Dretke

Case Details

Full title:EDWARD JENKINS v. DOUGLAS DRETKE

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Beaumont Division

Date published: Nov 29, 2005

Citations

Civil Action No. 1:05CV622 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 29, 2005)