From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jenkins v. Barnard

United States District Court, E.D. Texas
Jul 8, 2021
6:18-cv-00363 (E.D. Tex. Jul. 8, 2021)

Opinion

6:18-cv-00363

07-08-2021

Darrell Jenkins, Plaintiff, v. Shawn Barnard et al., Defendants.


ORDER

J. CAMPBELL BARKER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Plaintiff Darrell Jenkins, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, fled this civil rights lawsuit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge John D. Love. Doc. 4.

On May 4, 2020, defendants Shawn Barnard and Jade Gomillion fled a motion for summary judgment, asserting that plaintiff failed to assert a claim upon which relief can be granted and that they were entitled to qualified immunity. Doc. 30. After plaintiff fled a response (Doc. 38), the magistrate judge issued a report and recommendation that defendants' motion for summary judgment should be denied. Doc. 41. No. objections were fled to the report and recommendation.

When no party objects to a magistrate judge's report and recommendation, the court reviews it only for clear error. See Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Ass'n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1420 (5th Cir. 1996). Having reviewed the magistrate judge's report, and being satisfied that it contains no clear error, the court accepts its findings and recommendation. For the reasons stated in the report, defendants' motion for summary judgment (Doc. 30) is denied.

So ordered.


Summaries of

Jenkins v. Barnard

United States District Court, E.D. Texas
Jul 8, 2021
6:18-cv-00363 (E.D. Tex. Jul. 8, 2021)
Case details for

Jenkins v. Barnard

Case Details

Full title:Darrell Jenkins, Plaintiff, v. Shawn Barnard et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Texas

Date published: Jul 8, 2021

Citations

6:18-cv-00363 (E.D. Tex. Jul. 8, 2021)