From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jenkins v. Atkinson

Supreme Court of the United States
Oct 3, 2016
137 S. Ct. 236 (2016)

Summary

finding that even if an inmate requests video footage in preparation for a disciplinary hearing, the inmate "does not have a constitutional right to access the prison video footage in a disciplinary case."

Summary of this case from Ray v. Masters

Opinion

No. 16–5445.

10-03-2016

Jerry JENKINS, petitioner, v. Kenny ATKINSON, Warden.


Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.


Summaries of

Jenkins v. Atkinson

Supreme Court of the United States
Oct 3, 2016
137 S. Ct. 236 (2016)

finding that even if an inmate requests video footage in preparation for a disciplinary hearing, the inmate "does not have a constitutional right to access the prison video footage in a disciplinary case."

Summary of this case from Ray v. Masters
Case details for

Jenkins v. Atkinson

Case Details

Full title:Jerry JENKINS, petitioner, v. Kenny ATKINSON, Warden.

Court:Supreme Court of the United States

Date published: Oct 3, 2016

Citations

137 S. Ct. 236 (2016)
196 L. Ed. 2d 181

Citing Cases

Ray v. Masters

In any event, even if Petitioner did ask the DHO to review the footage and the DHO declined, the undersigned…