From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jenkins v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA VALDOSTA DIVISION
Feb 25, 2013
Civil Action No. 7:11-CV-92 (HL) (M.D. Ga. Feb. 25, 2013)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 7:11-CV-92 (HL)

02-25-2013

JULIA A. JENKINS, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner, Defendant.


ORDER

The Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Thomas Q. Langstaff is before the Court. (Doc. 13). Judge Langstaff recommends that the Commissioner's decision be affirmed pursuant to Sentence Four of § 405(g).

Plaintiff has filed objections to the Recommendation. She specifically contends (1) that the ALJ erred in finding her allegations of disability not entirely credible; and (2) that the ALJ improperly discounted the opinions of her treating neurosurgeon, Dr. Edward Mark.

Upon review, the Court finds that Plaintiff's objections are without merit. The Court accepts and adopts the Recommendation. The Commissioner's decision is affirmed pursuant to Sentence Four of § 405(g).

________________

HUGH LAWSON , SENIOR JUDGE


Summaries of

Jenkins v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA VALDOSTA DIVISION
Feb 25, 2013
Civil Action No. 7:11-CV-92 (HL) (M.D. Ga. Feb. 25, 2013)
Case details for

Jenkins v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:JULIA A. JENKINS, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA VALDOSTA DIVISION

Date published: Feb 25, 2013

Citations

Civil Action No. 7:11-CV-92 (HL) (M.D. Ga. Feb. 25, 2013)