From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jenkins v. Arce

United States District Court, Central District of California
Dec 20, 2024
2:24-cv-08473-DOC (BFM) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 20, 2024)

Opinion

2:24-cv-08473-DOC (BFM)

12-20-2024

Mark Jenkins v. Carlos Arce


Present: The Honorable Brianna Fuller Mircheff, United States Magistrate Judge.

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Proceedings: (In Chambers) Minute Order re: Order to Show Cause (ECF 4)

Petitioner Mark Jenkins filed a habeas petition in federal court arguing that he should be resentenced in state court. (ECF 1.) The Court issued an Order requiring Petitioner to show cause-meaning explain-why the Petition should not be dismissed. (ECF 3.) The Court explained that Petitioner's claim did not appear to be the kind of claim for which the federal courts may grant habeas relief and it appeared his claim was unexhausted.

The Court ordered Petitioner to respond to the Order no later than November 12, 2024. As of today's date, Petitioner has not filed anything with the Court. The Court will give him one more chance to do so.

Petitioner is ordered to respond to the Order no later than January 21, 2025, and to explain why the Court should not recommend dismissal of his Petition.

Petitioner's failure to file a timely response will result in the Court recommending that his case be dismissed without prejudice for failure to exhaust, failure to present cognizable claims, and/or for failure to prosecute and to follow court orders.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Jenkins v. Arce

United States District Court, Central District of California
Dec 20, 2024
2:24-cv-08473-DOC (BFM) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 20, 2024)
Case details for

Jenkins v. Arce

Case Details

Full title:Mark Jenkins v. Carlos Arce

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Dec 20, 2024

Citations

2:24-cv-08473-DOC (BFM) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 20, 2024)