From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jenkins-Naudain v. ABM Indus.

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Dec 6, 2022
2:22-cv-01826-CDS-NJK (D. Nev. Dec. 6, 2022)

Opinion

2:22-cv-01826-CDS-NJK

12-06-2022

TAKINA JENKINS-NAUDAIN, an individual; Plaintiff, v. ABM INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED, a foreign corporation; FLOWERS BAKING CO. OF HENDERSON, LLC, d/b/a FLOWERS FOODS, a domestic limited-liability company; DOES I-X; and ROE CORPORATIONS XI-XX inclusive, Defendants.

JACKSON LEWIS P.C. JOSHUA A. SLIKER, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 12493 KATLYN M. BRADY Nevada Bar No. 14173 GABROY | MESSER CHRISTIAN GABROY, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 8805 KAINE MESSER, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 14240 Attorneys of Defendant ABM Industries Inc. and Flowers Banking Co. of Henderson, LLC d/b/a Flowers Foods


JACKSON LEWIS P.C.

JOSHUA A. SLIKER, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 12493

KATLYN M. BRADY Nevada Bar No. 14173

GABROY | MESSER

CHRISTIAN GABROY, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 8805

KAINE MESSER, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 14240

Attorneys of Defendant ABM Industries Inc. and Flowers Banking Co. of Henderson, LLC d/b/a Flowers Foods

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO ANSWER PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT (SECOND REQUEST)

Defendants ABM Industries Inc. and Flowers Baking Co. of Henderson, LLC, d/b/a Flowers Foods., by and through their attorneys, the law firm of Jackson Lewis P.C. (collectively “Defendants”), and Plaintiff Takina Jenkins-Naudain (“Plaintiff'), by and through their counsel, Gabroy Messer, hereby stipulate and agree to an extension of time for Defendants to answer Plaintiffs Complaint, which is currently due on December 5,2022, up to and including January 31, 2022.

Good cause supports this request as the parties have recently provided their positions regarding arbitration and intend to have further discussions regarding this issue in an attempt to avoid motion practice.

Further, Defendants' counsel was recently out of the office for an extended period due to an illness and has only recently returned.

This stipulation and order is sought in good faith and not for the purpose of delay.

NO FURTHER EXTENSIONS WILL BE GRANTED.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED


Summaries of

Jenkins-Naudain v. ABM Indus.

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Dec 6, 2022
2:22-cv-01826-CDS-NJK (D. Nev. Dec. 6, 2022)
Case details for

Jenkins-Naudain v. ABM Indus.

Case Details

Full title:TAKINA JENKINS-NAUDAIN, an individual; Plaintiff, v. ABM INDUSTRIES…

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Dec 6, 2022

Citations

2:22-cv-01826-CDS-NJK (D. Nev. Dec. 6, 2022)