From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jenga v. Deveaux

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Oct 24, 1989
388 S.E.2d 361 (Ga. Ct. App. 1989)

Opinion

A89A1835.

DECIDED OCTOBER 24, 1989. REHEARING DENIED NOVEMBER 8, 1989.

Appeal dismissal. Fulton Superior Court. Before Judge Fryer.

Chimurenga Jenga, pro se.

Natsu Jenga, pro se. Raines F. Carter, for appellee.

Clinton E. Deveaux, pro se.


Chimurenga K. S. Jenga and his wife, Natsu Saito Jenga, appeal from the superior court's dismissal of their appeal from an interlocutory order of the City Court of Atlanta.

1. The record reveals that the order appealed from was one continuing the probable cause hearing of appellants on various charges and prohibiting appellants from exhibiting certain symbols and books on their clothing or in the courtroom. The superior court dismissed the appeal because "the evidence discloses no final appealable order." An appeal to the Superior Court from an order of the city courts may be taken only by petition for certiorari pursuant to OCGA § 5-4-3, and only from a "decision or judgment." "`The writ of certiorari does not lie to correct a judgment of an inferior judicatory until after a final determination of the cause. . . .' (Cit.)" Attwell v. Sears, Roebuck, 159 Ga. App. 811, 812 (2) ( 285 S.E.2d 199) (1981). Appellants neither appealed from a final decision or judgment nor filed a petition for certiorari pursuant to OCGA § 5-4-3, and accordingly we find no error by the superior court in dismissing the appeal.

However, even if we assume, arguendo, that appellants' appeal was correctly filed in superior court despite their failure to avail themselves of proper procedure, review by this court may be had of the superior court's order only by filing an application for leave to appeal. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (1). As appellants have not filed such an application, we are without jurisdiction to consider the appeal, and it is accordingly dismissed. Crawford v. Goza, 168 Ga. App. 565 ( 310 S.E.2d 1) (1983).

We note, without commenting on the merits of the contention, that even if the original order is viewed as an injunction, as urged by appellants, and is thus directly appealable from the city court pursuant to OCGA § 5-6-34 (a) (4), the appeal is directly to the Supreme Court, and the time for such an appeal expired long before the appeal at bar was dismissed by the superior court.

2. We find without merit all other contentions made by appellants.

Appeal dismissed. Banke, P. J., and Pope, J., concur.

DECIDED OCTOBER 24, 1989. REHEARING DENIED NOVEMBER 8, 1989 — CERT. APPLIED FOR.


Summaries of

Jenga v. Deveaux

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Oct 24, 1989
388 S.E.2d 361 (Ga. Ct. App. 1989)
Case details for

Jenga v. Deveaux

Case Details

Full title:JENGA et al. v. DEVEAUX

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Oct 24, 1989

Citations

388 S.E.2d 361 (Ga. Ct. App. 1989)
388 S.E.2d 361

Citing Cases

Starnes v. Fulton County School District

Moreover, finality of the pension board's decision under the local law and pension board bylaws is a…