Opinion
Civil Action 2:21-CV-00106
05-03-2022
CATHERINE JEFFRIES, Plaintiff, v. WAL-MART STORES TEXAS, L.L.C., Defendant.
ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
NELVA GONZALES RAMOS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.
On April 7, 2022, United States Magistrate Judge Mitchel Neurock entered a “Memorandum and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge” (M&R, D.E. 30). The parties were provided proper notice of, and opportunity to object to, the Magistrate Judge's M&R. Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); General Order No. 2002-13. No objections have been timely filed.
When no timely objection to a magistrate judge's M&R is filed, the district court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record and accept the magistrate judge's M&R. Guillory v. PPG Industries, Inc., 434 F.3d 303, 308 (5th Cir. 2005) (citing Douglass v. United Services Auto Ass'n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1420 (5th Cir. 1996)).
Having reviewed the findings of fact and conclusions of law set forth in the Magistrate Judge's M&R (D.E. 30), and all other relevant documents in the record, and finding no clear error, the Court ADOPTS as its own the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, the Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (D.E. 28) is GRANTED and this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
ORDERED.