From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jeffery v. State

State of Texas in the Fourteenth Court of Appeals
May 15, 2014
NO. 14-13-00987-CR (Tex. App. May. 15, 2014)

Opinion

NO. 14-13-00987-CR

05-15-2014

RANDALL ANDREZ JEFFERY, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee


Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed May 15, 2014.

On Appeal from the 149th District Court

Brazoria County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 70148


MEMORANDUM OPINION

A jury convicted appellant of the offense of failing to stop and render aid. Tex. Transp. Code Ann. § 550.021(c). On October 24, 2013, the trial court sentenced appellant to confinement for ten years in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, suspended. Appellant filed a notice of appeal.

On April 24, 2014, this court ordered a hearing to determine why appellant's counsel had not filed a brief in this appeal. On May 5, 2014, the reporter's record of a hearing conducted March 24, 2014, was filed in this court. The hearing record reflects that appellant no longer wishes to pursue his appeal.

Appellant has not filed a written motion to withdraw the appeal or a written motion to dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a). However, based upon the testimony at the hearing that appellant does not want to continue his appeal, we conclude that good cause exists to suspend the operation of Rule 42.2(a) in this case. See Tex. R. App. P. 2.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justice Christopher, Jamison and McCally. Do Not Publish - Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).


Summaries of

Jeffery v. State

State of Texas in the Fourteenth Court of Appeals
May 15, 2014
NO. 14-13-00987-CR (Tex. App. May. 15, 2014)
Case details for

Jeffery v. State

Case Details

Full title:RANDALL ANDREZ JEFFERY, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:State of Texas in the Fourteenth Court of Appeals

Date published: May 15, 2014

Citations

NO. 14-13-00987-CR (Tex. App. May. 15, 2014)

Citing Cases

Campbell v. State

Based on this testimony, we conclude that good cause exists to suspend operation of Rule 42.2(a) in this…