From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jefferson v. Smith

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Nov 22, 2022
3:22-cv-00200-MMD-CSD (D. Nev. Nov. 22, 2022)

Opinion

3:22-cv-00200-MMD-CSD

11-22-2022

BRANDON M. JEFFERSON, Plaintiff, v. ROBERT SMITH, et al., Defendants.

AARON D. FORD Attorney General WILLIAM P. SHOGREN, Bar No. 14619 Deputy Attorney General State of Nevada Attorneys for Defendants BRANDON M. JEFFERSON #1094051 Plaintiff, Pro Se


AARON D. FORD

Attorney General

WILLIAM P. SHOGREN, Bar No. 14619

Deputy Attorney General

State of Nevada

Attorneys for Defendants

BRANDON M. JEFFERSON #1094051 Plaintiff, Pro Se

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION AND ORDER TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE

MIRANDA M. DU, CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Defendants, by and through counsel, Aaron D. Ford, Nevada Attorney General, and William P. Shogren, Deputy Attorney General, of the State of Nevada, Office of the Attorney General; and Plaintiff Brandon M. Jefferson, pro se, under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, stipulate that the above-captioned action shall be dismissed with prejudice, with each party bearing their own attorney's fees and costs.

The Parties have resolved this matter in its entirety and agree that the Court may accordingly close the case, with prejudice. Any outstanding deadlines are considered moot.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED. This matter is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and the Clerk is directed to close the case.


Summaries of

Jefferson v. Smith

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Nov 22, 2022
3:22-cv-00200-MMD-CSD (D. Nev. Nov. 22, 2022)
Case details for

Jefferson v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:BRANDON M. JEFFERSON, Plaintiff, v. ROBERT SMITH, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Nov 22, 2022

Citations

3:22-cv-00200-MMD-CSD (D. Nev. Nov. 22, 2022)