From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jefferson v. Cooke

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 1, 2009
No. 1:06-cv-00723-DGC (E.D. Cal. Oct. 1, 2009)

Opinion

No. 1:06-cv-00723-DGC.

October 1, 2009


ORDER


On August 21, 2009, Defendant Cooke filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint on the ground that Plaintiff failed to exhaust administrative remedies. Dkt. #28. Plaintiff shall file a response to the motion by October 30, 2009. Defendant may file a reply by November 13, 2009. Plaintiff is advised that if he fails to comply with this order, the Court may dismiss the action with prejudice. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b); see Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1260 (9th Cir. 1992); Ghazali v. Moran, 46 F.3d 52, 54 (9th Cir. 1995).

IT IS ORDERED:

1. Plaintiff shall file a response to Defendant's motion to dismiss (Dkt. #28) by October 30, 2009.
2. Defendant may file a reply by November 13, 2009.
3. This action may be dismissed if Plaintiff fails to comply with this order.


Summaries of

Jefferson v. Cooke

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 1, 2009
No. 1:06-cv-00723-DGC (E.D. Cal. Oct. 1, 2009)
Case details for

Jefferson v. Cooke

Case Details

Full title:James L. Jefferson, Plaintiff, v. B. Cooke, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Oct 1, 2009

Citations

No. 1:06-cv-00723-DGC (E.D. Cal. Oct. 1, 2009)