Every doubt is to be resolved in favor of the validity of the award. Jefferson Township v. Toro Dev. Corp., 199 N.J. Super. 459, 464, 489 A.2d 1212 (App.Div. 1955). The court's role in reviewing arbitration awards is tightly circumscribed.
This holding, however, ignores the long-established rule that the lack of a statement of reasons in an arbitration award is not grounds for vacation of the award. Jefferson Tp. v. Toro Development Corp., 199 N.J. Super. 459, 462, 489 A.2d 1212 (App.Div. 1985); Korshalla v. Liberty Mutual Ins. Co., 154 N.J. Super. 235, 238, 381 A.2d 88 (Law Div. 1977); Tave Constr. Co., Inc. v. Wiesenfeld, 82 N.J. Super. 562, 566, 198 A.2d 486 (Ch.Div. 1964), aff'd o.b., 90 N.J. Super. 244, 217 A.2d 140 (App.Div.), certif. den.