From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jefferson County v. Acker

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Jan 12, 1996
73 F.3d 1066 (11th Cir. 1996)

Opinion

No. 94-6400

Filed January 12, 1996

Edwin A. Strickland, Jeffrey M. Sewell, Charles S. Wagner, Birmingham, AL, for appellant.

Irwin W. Stolz, Jr., Seaton D. Purdom, Gambrell Stolz, Atlanta, GA, for Acker Clemon.

Kevin M. Forde, Richard J. Prendergast, Chicago, IL, for Federal Judges Association (amicus).

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama.

Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, KRAVITCH, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, CARNES and BARKETT, Circuit Judges.

Senior U.S. Circuit Judge Albert J. Henderson has elected to participate in further proceedings in this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §(s) 46(c).


ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion August 21, 1995, 11th Cir., 1995, 61 F.2d 848)


A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc, IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel's opinion is hereby VACATED.


Summaries of

Jefferson County v. Acker

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Jan 12, 1996
73 F.3d 1066 (11th Cir. 1996)
Case details for

Jefferson County v. Acker

Case Details

Full title:JEFFERSON COUNTY, A political subdivision of the State of Alabama…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit

Date published: Jan 12, 1996

Citations

73 F.3d 1066 (11th Cir. 1996)

Citing Cases

Jefferson County v. Acker

The original panel opinion addressed that issue and concluded that the occupational tax does not discriminate…

Sammarco v. Board of Trustees

(See Pl.'s Mem. of L. in Supp. of Mot. for Summ. J. at 6). However, under the "arbitrary and capricious"…