From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jeffers v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia
May 24, 1993
429 S.E.2d 519 (Ga. 1993)

Opinion

S93A0304.

DECIDED MAY 24, 1993.

Murder. Cobb Superior Court. Before Judge Kreeger.

Steven P. Berne, for appellant.

Thomas J. Charron, District Attorney, Debra H. Bernes, Nancy I. Jordan, Assistant District Attorneys, Michael J. Bowers, Attorney General, Susan V. Boleyn, Senior Assistant Attorney General, C. A. Benjamin Woolf, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.


Gary Todd Jeffers shot and killed Tyra Daniels, his live-in girl friend, with a handgun, following a lengthy argument between the two. He was convicted of malice murder and sentenced to life imprisonment. He appeals and we affirm.

Jeffers killed Daniels on August 15, 1991, and was indicted by the Cobb County Grand Jury on November 5, 1991. He was tried before a jury February 25-27, 1992, and convicted on February 27, 1992. His motion for new trial, filed March 5, 1992, was denied on July 7, 1992. Jeffers filed his notice of appeal on August 7, 1992. The appeal was docketed in this court on November 25, 1992, and orally argued on March 8, 1993.

1. After reviewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the jury's determination, we conclude that a rational trier of fact could have found Jeffers guilty of malice murder beyond a reasonable doubt. Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 ( 99 S.C. 2781, 61 L.Ed.2d 560) (1979).

2. Contrary to Jeffers' contentions, the two questions he claims he should have been permitted to ask a state's witness on cross-examination were of marginal, if any, relevance, and the trial court did not abuse its discretion in sustaining the state's objections to those questions. O'Neal v. State, 254 Ga. 1, 3 (3) ( 325 S.E.2d 759) (1985); White v. State, 253 Ga. 106, 110 (4) ( 317 S.E.2d 196) (1984).

3. Jeffers raises a claim of ineffectiveness of trial counsel for the first time in this appeal. Although appellate counsel did not file Jeffers' motion for new trial, appellate counsel obtained a continuance of a hearing on that motion, failed to file an amended motion raising the issue of ineffectiveness of trial counsel, and failed to raise that issue at the hearing on the motion for new trial. Accordingly, Jeffers' claim of ineffectiveness of trial counsel is procedurally barred. Owens v. State, 263 Ga. 99 ( 428 S.E.2d 793) (1993).

Judgment affirmed. All the Justices concur.


DECIDED MAY 24, 1993.


Summaries of

Jeffers v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia
May 24, 1993
429 S.E.2d 519 (Ga. 1993)
Case details for

Jeffers v. State

Case Details

Full title:JEFFERS v. THE STATE

Court:Supreme Court of Georgia

Date published: May 24, 1993

Citations

429 S.E.2d 519 (Ga. 1993)
429 S.E.2d 519

Citing Cases

W.O.W. v. Jordan

4. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in sustaining Jordan's relevance objection to Wanda Watford's…

Height v. State

Accordingly, the question was of marginal, if any, relevance. Jeffers v. State, 263 Ga. 133 (2) ( 429 S.E.2d…